State v. Weissinger
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1DissentReilly, J.
¶ 31. (dissenting). A criminal justice system that allows the government to destroy the sole evidence of a person's guilt prior to notice, charging, or a meaningful opportunity for the accused to inspect the State's evidence is fundamentally unfair. The State charged Weissinger with having something in her blood, but then destroyed the blood prior to giving Weissinger any meaningful opportunity to inspect the blood. It is a perversion of justice that we apparently accord more due process evidentiary protection to our property than we accord to our liberty interests. I respectfully dissent *567—the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Illinois v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. AmundsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.