Legal Opinion

United States v. Hanover Vulcanite Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 18, 1913No. 1194PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 32435 (T. D. 33433).

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

This case is argued only on behalf of the Government, the appellant.

The merchandise was returned by the appraiser as smokers’ articles and so classified by the collector. In the appraiser’s return it was described as finished pipe mouthpieces of rubber and was invoiced as single mountings. It was assessed at 60 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 475 of the tariff act of 1909. No sample of the importation was retained.

The importers appealed to the Board of General Appraisers, and at the hearing of the protest there was offered in evidence by the importer what the witness testified was a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. EytingeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bush & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API