Legal Opinion

Marcellus Electric Railroad v. Crisler

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1900Published

Application for the appointment of commissioners for the appraisal of certain real estate sought to be condemned.

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, W. S., J.

Certain objections are made to the sufficiency of the petition by the attorneys for Noah B. Orisler and Josephine Orisler, who appear specially for that purpose.

The proceeding was begun under the General Condemnation Law and must, in all things, strictly comply with section 3360 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

It is claimed by defendants that the residence of the owners of the property is not given as required by subdivision 4 of that section. The allegation contained in the petition is that “ Noah B. Orisler is the owner of said premises and resides at Syracuse, N. Y.; that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stillwater & Mechanicville Street Railway Co. v. SladeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. In re Suburban Rapid Transit Co.New York Supreme Court · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API