FERNANDO GARCIA v. MVT Services, Inc.

ORDER

KATHLEEN CARDONE, District Judge.

On this day, the Court considered Plaintiffs’ “Motion to Remand” (“Plaintiffs’ Motion”); Defendant’s “Response to Plaintiffs[’] Motion for Remand” (“Defendant’s Response”); and Plaintiffs’ “Reply and Request for Attorneys’ Fees” (“Plaintiffs’ Reply”). After due consideration, for the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiffs’ Motion is GRANTED.

I. BACKGROUND

On August 22, 2007, Plaintiffs filed their Original Petition in the 171st Judicial Dis trict Court, El Paso County, Texas, in the case styled Jesus Fernando Garcia and Maria de Lourdes Garcia, as wrongful…