Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Smith v. Powell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 11, 1977No. 5PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAKE, Justice.

G.S. 20-16.2 provides:

“(a) Any person who drives or operates a motor vehicle upon any highway or any public vehicular area shall be deemed to have given consent, subject to the provisions of G.S. 20-139.1, to a chemical test or tests of his breath or blood for the purpose of determining the alcoholic content of his blood if arrested for any offense arising out of acts alleged to have been committed while the person was driving or operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The test or tests shall be administered at the request of a law-enforcement…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. WigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Victory Cab Co. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. WolfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. State v. . LipkinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. State v. PinyatelloSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jordan Ex Rel. Winston v. Foust Oil Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  2. Hancock Advertising v. Dept. of Transp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. Wallace v. Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. MainsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  5. Robinson v. FlahertyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API