Legal Opinion

State v. Greene

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1999No. 67250-4PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The primary issue in this appeal is whether dissociative identity disorder (DID) is admissible under Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013, 34 A.L.R. 145 (D.C. Cir. 1923) and Washington Rules of Evidence (ER) 702 to establish the defense of insanity or diminished capacity. In a pretrial hearing, the trial court concluded DID testimony was not admissible under Frye or ER 702. Following trial by jury, the defendant, William B. Greene (Greene), was convicted of indecent liberties and first degree kidnapping. On appeal, holding that DID is generally accepted in the scientific community and relevant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. CauthronWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. JanesWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. RikerWashington Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. William B. Greene v. John LambertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. State v. AtsbehaWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. AtsbehaWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 2017
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 2012

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API