Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. SEARS ROEBUCK & CO.

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided June 17, 2010No. Civil Action 09-0584PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING

ROBERT G. JAMES, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 21] filed by Defendants Sears Roebuck & Co. (“Sears”) and Anthony Gewin (“Gewin”) against Plaintiff Sufernia Montgomery (“Montgomery”). For the following reasons, the Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. However, Montgomery is granted leave to amend her Complaint to include a retaliation claim, which remains pending for trial.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Montgomery, a black female, was employed with Sears in Monroe, Louisiana, from July 22, 1975, to December 1, 2009, when she…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Body by Cook, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2018
  2. Yarbrough v. CSS Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API