Legal Opinion
People v. Lindsey
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 18, 2007No. A113628PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SEPULVEDA, J.
Jamar Lindsey appeals from a conviction following his no contest plea to being a felon in possession of a firearm. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion pursuant to Penal Code section 1538.5 1 to suppress evidence seized after a 911 call reported that a shot had been fired close to where Lindsey ultimately was detained and searched. We afBrm the judgment.
Factual And Procedural Background
About 9:30 p.m. on November 9, 2004, Pittsburg police dispatch received a 911 hang-up call that was traced to a residence on West Boulevard, a residential street. A…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Florida v. JLSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. H.M.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. Fews, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- In Re HMCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- In re S.P. CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. FewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.