Legal Opinion

Duiven v. Brakesman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1959No. Docket 78, Calendar 47,814PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This case arises out of an option agreement relating to the sale of real property. The plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Duiven, are the buyers, the defendants, Mr. and Mrs. Brakesman, the sellers.

On June 15, 1955, the parties entered into an instrument entitled “Preliminary Agreement.” This agreement provided, in substance, that the plaintiffs would purchase the Royal Motel and Restaurant, in the city, of Grand Rapids, for the sum of $50,000, with adjustments to be made for certain improvements, the agreement acknowledging the receipt of a “payment of $2,000 as a binder.” It further provided that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kaminski v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Dalton v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Taylor v. ButcherMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Sieloff v. HubbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Keller v. Paulos Land Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API