Legal Opinion
Huestis v. County of Nassau
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 30, 1963Published
1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittori, J.
In this taxpayer’s action, the defendants move to dismiss the complaint pursuant to paragraph 7 of subdivision (a) of rule 3211 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, and the plaintiff moves for summary judgment, pursuant to rule 3212 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules.
Briefly stated, the complaint alleges: that an agreement entered by the Nassau County Executive and the defendant Andrew Fabrizio on or about August 1,1963, wherein the county authorizes Fabrizio to operate and manage an outdoor golf driving range at Nassau County Park in Salisbury, County of Nassau, from July 26, 1963 to July…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kaskel v. ImpellitteriNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Kittinger v. . Buffalo Traction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Altschul v. . LudwigNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Layton v. A. I. Namm & Sons, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Blank v. BrowneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.