Legal Opinion
Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Chappuis
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 27, 1970No. 3171PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS' APPEAL
2Per curiam
The plaintiff appellee has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal on the grounds that only one of the multiple defendants appellants has filed the required suspensive appeal bond.
The pertinent facts show that on January 27, 1970, the district judge signed an order for a suspensive appeal by “P. J. Chappuis, II, et al.”, defendants in the above matter, conditioned on their furnishing bond in the sum of $1,000. A bond in the full required amount was filed by only one of the defendants, namely, P. J. Chappuis, II. Plaintiffs contend this appeal must be…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Rosier v. Good Pine Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- Succession of SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- Brumfield v. BrumfieldLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
4Cited by4 opinions
- Super Construction Co., Inc. v. New Orleans Levee Bd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Brown v. DrennanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
- Corkern v. Main Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- Lawrence Franks and Robbie Franks v. State National Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2022