Legal Opinion

Hill v. Selectmen of Easthampton

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 5, 1886PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtW. Allen, J.

This is a petition under the Pub. Sts. c. 27, § 129, to restrain the town of Easthampton from the payment of money voted by the town to defray the expenses of celebrating, in the year 1885, the one hundredth anniversary of its incorporation. The Pub. Sts. c. 27, § 11, authorize any town to appropriate money “for the purpose of celebrating any centennial anniversary of its incorporation.” By the St. of 1785, c. 7, Easthampton was incorporated into a district, “ with all the powers, privileges, and immunities, that districts in this Commonwealth are entitled to, or do or may enjoy, according to…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. City & County of Denver v. HallettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  2. Daggett v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. State ex rel. Douglas County v. CornellNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. State ex rel. City of New Richmond v. DavidsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Shelby County v. Exposition Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API