Legal Opinion

Higginbotham v. Police Officer Curtis Sylvester

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 25, 2018No. 16-3994Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

16-3994 Higginbotham v. Police Officer Curtis Sylvester UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Weyant v. OkstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  3. Jenkins v. City Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  4. Fabrikant v. FrenchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  5. Lozman v. Riviera BeachSupreme Court of the United States · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API