Legal Opinion
Austin v. Kemper Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 13, 2025No. 3:24-cv-04183Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN, Case No. 24-cv-04183-JD 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE DISMISSAL v. 9 10 KEMPER CORP., et al., Defendants. 11 12 13 The gravamen of plaintiff George Austin’s allegations and claims against defendant 14 Kemper Corp. is that, after Austin was injured in a car accident by a Kemper-insured driver, 15 Kemper discriminated against Austin by refusing to agree to a settlement because of his race. See 16 Dkt. No. 34 (FAC) at ECF 8-9, 11-13, 24-31; Dkt. No. 71 ¶¶ 3-4. Essentially the same allegations 17 and claims…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Margaret Stewart Jamey L. Paulson William Keith Laura Spencer Lee Callison Stephanie Glowa Terri Gorecki Dan Berryman v. U.S. BancorpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Bell Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994