Legal Opinion
Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 24, 2011No. 09-291PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION OF THE COURT
[562 U.S. 172]
2Opinion of the Court · ScaliaJustice Scalia
Until 2003, both petitioner Eric Thompson and his fiance, Miriam Re-galado, were employees of respondent North American Stainless (NAS). In February 2003, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) notified NAS that Regalado had filed a charge alleging sex discrimination. Three weeks later, NAS fired Thompson.
Thompson then filed a charge with the EEOC. After conciliation efforts proved unsuccessful, he sued NAS in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 253, 42…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of BellwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by77 opinions
- Bank of Am. Corp. v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- J. DeMasters v. Carilion ClinicCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Veronica Ollier v. Sweetwater Union High SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Loudermilk v. Best Pallet Co., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Nazariy Lesiv v. Illinois Central Railroad ComCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.