Legal Opinion

Cheatham v. Mann

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 2, 1939No. 10877PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Justice.

This much of a statement from the brief of plaintiffs in error, albeit somewhat partisan and advocatory, contains a sort of general resume of both the nature and result of the suit below, and of their contentions as to what should be the disposition of the appeal of it here, to-wit:

“Plaintiffs in error here were the defendants in the trial court below. They are all named in the caption above. All the defendants in error, named in the caption, were the plaintiffs below.
“This is an appeal from the trial court judgment perpetually restraining and enjoining plaintiffs in error…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dakan v. DakanTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Smith v. ButlerTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Avery v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Askey v. PowerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  5. Rogers v. TrevathanTexas Supreme Court · 1887

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Wright v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Reynolds v. Kessler, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1984
  3. Hodge v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  4. Gulf View Courts, Inc. v. Galveston CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Cragin v. Frost Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API