Legal Opinion

Burry Ry. Supply Co. v. Laughlin

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 5, 1924No. 3294PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVAN A. EVANS, Circuit Judge.

Appellees, hereinafter called plaintiffs, brought this suit against appellants, hereinafter called the defendants, to determine the validity of certain patents, and to enjoin their further alleged infringement. Claims 22 to 26 of the Laughlin patent, No. 1,396,687, and 32 and 33 of Laughlin patent, No. 1,396,688, are involved. Likewise an interference contest involving claims 1 to 7 of Laughlin patent No. 1,396,687 is presented. ____

*939Defendants contend that they are entitled to these claims allowed by reason of the grant of patent No. 1,191,153 to Burry. The Burry…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Perry Auto Lock Co. v. Security Lock Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States Ozone Co. v. United States Ozone Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
  2. Leach v. Ross Heater & Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API