Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Lord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 10, 1997PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 4, 1996, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant’s benefit rate should be reduced.

The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that Labor Law § 600 (7) (b) required a reduction in claimant’s benefit rate reflecting his receipt of payments from an employer-funded pension fund. Claimant was also charged with a recoverable overpayment. We affirm. Substantial evidence supports the finding that claimant’s pension fund was 100% funded by the employer, thereby triggering the statutory reduction in benefit payments (see,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of ChriscadenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. In re the Claim of SkinderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of LicciardelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API