Legal Opinion

Marshall v. United States Trust Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1903Published

Actkmt to compel payment of a judgment out of the income of a fund held hy the defendant trustees.

1Opinion of the CourtScott, J.

This is an action hy the assignee of a judgment creditor of one William C. Flanagan to compel payment of the judgment out of the income of a fund held hy the defendant trustees. On October 28, 1897, the plaintiff’s assignor recovered a judgment against Flanagan and another, which remains unpaid, and upon which execution has been duly issued and returned unsatisfied. On November 10, 1896, Mary A. Flanagan, the mother of William 0. Flanagan, conveyed to him a life estate in certain property at the comer of Avenue B and Fourteenth street, in the city of New York. The property then was, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. . ShulerNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Schenck v. . BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Corning & Norton v. WhiteNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  4. Mandeville v. CampbellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API