Legal Opinion

State v. Winstandley

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1898No. 18,444PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Clark Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

The appellee Winstandley, being the president, and the appellee Frederick, being the cashier, of the New Albany Banking Company, were indicted for embezzlement, charged with having received certain deposits for said banking company, knowing the company to be at the time insolvent. On February 6, 1897, the prosecution under said indictment having been called for trial, the appellees appeared and filed their joint affidavit for a continuance, and the trial was accordingly continued. Thereafter, on February 11, 1897, the appellees were jointly indicted for perjury, for having, in said affidavit…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Shular v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Hall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Elliott v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  4. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  5. State v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. LehmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  2. Lynn v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Parrett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
  4. State v. VarnadoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  5. State v. RathjinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API