Legal Opinion

Cummings v. Riley Stoker Corp.

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided September 24, 1946No. 4297PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REEVES, District Judge.

This case presents very unusual features. The question of fraudulent joinder is not involved. The petition for removal simply asserts that the defendant Riley Stoker Corporation is a non-resident Corporation and that there was no such local corporate entity as Hughes Machinery Company. The latter averment is supported by the affidavit of Elmer L. Hughes. The question for decision, therefore, is whether, upon the facts as hereinafter stated, the case should be remanded or jurisdiction retained here.

The suit as originally brought was against “Riley Stoker Corporation, a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Polito v. MolaskyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Fibreboard Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1953
  2. Wolsum v. J. W. Bateson Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API