Legal Opinion

State ex rel. County of Dawson v. Dawson County Irrigation Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1934No. 28860PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel respondent to repair certain bridges, constructed by it over its irrigation ditches and laterals where they intersect and cross public highways in Dawson county. Relator was given the relief it sought. From the judgment granting that relief respondent has appealed.

The facts are not in dispute. The controversy hinges on the validity of section 46-619, Comp. St. 1929. Respondent contends that said section relieves it of the duty of keeping the bridges in question in repair and safe for public use, and that the duty to make such repairs rests upon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Dawson County v. Farmers & Merchants Irrigation Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  2. State ex rel. Lancaster County v. C., B. & Q. R.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  3. State ex rel. Cone v. BaumanNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Richardson County ex rel. Sheehan v. Drainage District No. 1Nebraska Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Franklin County v. Wilt & PollyNebraska Supreme Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United Community Services v. Omaha National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Moeller, McPherrin & Judd v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Fougeron v. County of SewardNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Joseph v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation District v. County of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API