Commonwealth v. Winstead
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s petition under the Post Conviction Hearing Act (PCHA), 42 *486Pa. C.S.A. §§ 9541-9551. Appellant contends that counsel was ineffective for failing to (1) impeach the Commonwealth’s witness with his prior inconsistent statements by using the notes of testimony from appellant’s first trial; (2) investigate the scene of the alleged crime and object to an inaccurate diagram of the scene used by the Commonwealth during the trial; (3) request a polling of the individual jurors; and (4) move for a mistrial after it was discovered that a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. PettusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. BuehlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. PetrasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001