Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Winstead

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 14, 1988No. 511PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s petition under the Post Conviction Hearing Act (PCHA), 42 *486Pa. C.S.A. §§ 9541-9551. Appellant contends that counsel was ineffective for failing to (1) impeach the Commonwealth’s witness with his prior inconsistent statements by using the notes of testimony from appellant’s first trial; (2) investigate the scene of the alleged crime and object to an inaccurate diagram of the scene used by the Commonwealth during the trial; (3) request a polling of the individual jurors; and (4) move for a mistrial after it was discovered that a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. PettusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. BuehlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. PetrasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API