Legal Opinion

Esmatullah Zamani v. Kristi Noem, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 29, 2026No. 2:26-cv-00205Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ESMATULLAH ZAMANI, No. 2:26-cv-0205 DC AC 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 KRISTI NOEM, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 17 Petitioner, a self-represented immigration detainee, filed a petition for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2241

together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. 19 Examination of the in forma pauperis application reveals that petitioner is unable to afford the 20 costs of suit. Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. See 28 21…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Dean Foods Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Staten Island University Hospital v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API