Legal Opinion

Ironshore Europe Dac v. Schiff Hardin, LLP

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided January 9, 2018No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17–CV–00431–JRGPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RODNEY GILSTRAP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is Defendant Schiff Hardin, LLP's ("Schiff") Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Ironshore Europe DAC's ("Ironshore") First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 17) ("the Motion"). Having considered the same, and for the reasons set forth herein, the Motion is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART .

*848I. Background

In November 2014, Ironshore issued an insurance policy to Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc. ("Dorel"). (Dkt. No. 10 ¶ 2.) On May 13, 2015, Dorel was sued by Nicole and Cameron Hinson on behalf of their minor child who was injured in a car accident…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Lone Star Fund v (U.S.), L.P. v. Barclays Bank PLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  4. Bustos v. Martini Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  5. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Jefferson Associates, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Urban Oil & Gas Group, LLC, Urban Fund III, LP, and Urban Oil & Gas Partners C-1, LP v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, Subscribing to Policy No. B0702GL314250District Court, E.D. Texas · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API