Legal Opinion
In re Brinker
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 17, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOYLE, Judge.
Louis and Pearl Orient, August Hirko, Camille Naffah and Carol Dinco (collectively, Appellants) appeal an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County (Common Pleas) confirming a report of a Board of View finding that a private road across portions of their properties should be opened.
In addressing the issues presented, an understanding of the procedural background, including the chronological development of the case, is necessary. This litigation was commenced when Barry Brinker and Joann Brinker, husband and wife, brought an action pursuant to Section 11 of the Act…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re Laying Out & Opening a Private RoadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Mattei v. HurayCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Graff v. ScanlanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Driver v. TempleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- A Condemnation Proceeding in Rem by the Redevelopment Authority of City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Philadelphia Police Department v. Civil Service CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Soska v. BishopCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- In Re Interest of ForresterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- In Re Laying Out & Opening a Private Road in Sullivan TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009