Legal Opinion

Axelrod v. Howell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 1, 1937No. Appeal, 257PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

After all the evidence on both sides had been given, and, following his address to the jury, plaintiffs’ counsel stated to the trial judge that his clients desired to suffer a voluntary nonsuit. Defendant’s attorney objected, giving as Ms reason that argument to the jury had been made by his opponent. The judge refused leave to enter the nonsuit, the trial proceeded, and resulted in a verdict in favor of defendant. Upon subsequent consideration, the judge reached the conclusion, “reluctantly,” that under the law in Pennsylvania a plaintiff has the right to suffer a voluntary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. James v. BreamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. Crumley v. LutzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  3. Felts v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fanstiel v. WrightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  2. Cherniak v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Cherniak v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1940
  4. David Magen, Builder, Inc. v. Price, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1939
  5. Hix v. Womelsdorf Bank & Trust Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API