Legal Opinion

Adkins v. Commissioner of Social Security

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 17, 2007No. 07-5132Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

CLAY, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff James C. Adkins appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security in this action, under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to obtain judicial review of a decision from an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) denying Plaintiffs application for disability insurance benefits. Specifically, Plaintiff alleges that the ALJ improperly relied on the Medical Vocational Guidelines, 20 C.F.R. pt. 404, subpt. P. App. 2, in establishing that his nonexertional limitations did not prevent him from doing work. We agree. Accordingly, we…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Barbara L. BRAINARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  3. Theresa E. Foster v. William A. HalterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  4. Frances Buxton v. William A. Halter, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. Kirk v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API