People v. Romo
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
Defendant was convicted, following a jury trial, of assault with a deadly weapon. (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a).) He was sentenced to prison for the term prescribed by law.
Defendant contends the judgment must be reversed on the following grounds: (1) accomplice instructions (CALJIC No. 3.18), cautionary instructions relating to oral admissions (CALJIC Nos. 2.70 or 2.71), and instructions on the weighing of conflicting testimony (CALJIC No. 2.22) should have been given sua sponte; (2) an instruction regarding the effect of absence of motive should have been given (CALJIC No.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- People v. IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. SweeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- People v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. MoralesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. WilkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. EnriquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.