Legal Opinion

Butin v. Rothman

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 17, 1957No. 18095PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hall

We will refer to the parties as they appeared in the trial court where plaintiffs in error were defendants and defendant in error, Paul Rothmán, was plaintiff. Defendant in error L & H Coffee Shop and Tavern, Inc., is no longer a party to the proceedings.. . Plaintiff brought an action in replevin to obtain possession of personal property consisting of tavern furniture, fixtures, equipment and utensils then in possession of defendants; plaintiff claims he is entitled to possession of the property by virtue of a chattel mortgage executed by L and H Coffee Shop and Tavern, Inc., as mortgagor,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. M. P. Musser & Co. v. KingNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Perry v. WeeksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  3. Everett v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  4. Rhea Mortgage Co. v. LemmermanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  5. Nutwell v. Tongue's LesseeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1864

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Melville v. SouthwardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. People v. BuggsColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Cheyenne National Bank v. Citizens Savings BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Aspen Properties Co. v. PrebleColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Bill Dreiling Motor Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Mar. Ins. Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API