Legal Opinion

Mangar v. Parkash 180 LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 23, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendants established that the half-inch height differential at the top of a two-step exterior stairway was trivial and nonactionable (see Trincere v County of Suffolk, 90 NY2d 976, 977 [1997]; Morales v Riverbay Corp., 226 AD2d 271 [1st Dept 1996]). In opposition, plaintiff, who had walked on the steps twice daily for years without incident, failed to raise a triable is*608sue of fact. Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, DeGrasse and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Trincere v. County of SuffolkNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Morales v. Riverbay Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. Sheridan Hill House Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Hutchinson v. Sheridan Hill House Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013