Legal Opinion

Lagden v. Concordia Mutual Fire Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1919No. Docket No. 4PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Bay; Houghton, J. Assumpsit by Harry T. Lagden against the .Concordia Mutual Fire Insurance Company of Bay, Saginaw and Arenac counties on a policy of insurance. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This case has been here before and is reported in 188 Mich. 689. Upon the second trial the evidence taken on the first trial was read in evidence and. some additional testimony taken. At the close of the testimony each of the parties asked for a directed verdict. It was the claim of the plaintiff that Act No. 128 of the Public Acts of 1911 (2 Comp. Laws 1915, § 9481) controlled the case and that a verdict should be directed in his favor. It was the contention of the defendant that as the policy was issued in 1908 that Act No. 128 had no applicability and such was the view of the circuit judge…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brady v. North Western InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Ladies of the Modern Maccabees v. Illinois Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Lagden v. Concordia Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hanover Fire Ins. v. DallavoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
  2. Gervickes v. Royal Exchange Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API