Legal Opinion

City of Klamath Falls v. Oregon Liquor Control Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1934PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is a suit to enjoin the defendant officials from enforcing chapter 17, Laws of Oregon for 1933 (2d Sp. Sess.), known as the “Oregon Liquor Control Act”, on the ground that it is unconstitutional. The circuit court sustained a general demurrer to the complaint, and, upon refusal of the plaintiff to plead further, dismissed the suit. Plaintiff appeals.

It appears from the allegations of the complaint that the city of Klamath Palls, prior to the above legislative act, enacted an ordinance purporting to regulate, license, and control the sale, buying, and transportation of alcoholic liquors…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Straw v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Rose v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Lovejoy v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. State v. SchluerOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Booth Mercantile Co. v. MurphyIdaho Supreme Court · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. City of Roseburg v. Roseburg City Firefighters, Local No. 1489Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Perry v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Ex Parte JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  5. Harrison v. Wyoming Liquor CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1947

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API