Legal Opinion

English v. Woodman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1888PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Sedgwick District Court ActioN brought by Woodman against English and another, to recover the possession of lot 59, on Court street, in the city of Wichita. Trial at the May term, 1887, and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendants bring the case here. •

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ClogstoN, C.:

In the court below it was admitted by the parties that the defendants, plaintiffs in error, had the legal title to the lot from the government down, and were entitled to the possession thereof, unless divested by the judgment, sale, and deed in proceedings had under and by virtue of chapter 39 of the Laws of 1877.

Plaintiff, to maintain the issues on his part, offered in evidence the deed executed by the sheriff of Sedgwick county to himself, he having been the purchaser at such sale. This deed was objected to, the objection overruled, and plaintiff rested. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Foreman v. CarterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Board of County Commissioners v. RadleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. BenefielSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  3. Williams v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. Sheehy v. LemonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API