Legal Opinion

Ex parte Pullin

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 23, 1980No. 64614PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*936OPINION

W. C. DAVIS, Judge.

This is a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to Article 11.07, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. Petitioner contends that the information1 under which she was convicted is fundamentally defective, in that it fails to allege all of the elements of the offense.

Petitioner was convicted of tampering with a witness. V.T.C.A. Penal Code, Section 36.06 provides:

“(a) A person commits an offense if, with intent to influence the witness, he offers, confers, or agrees to confer any benefit on a witness or prospective witness in an official proceeding or coerces a witness or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CannonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Standley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Ex Parte WintonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Ex parte NixonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API