Legal Opinion

Beckum v. State, Department of Professional Regulation

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 16, 1983No. AR-104PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

427 So.2d 276 (1983)

John T. BECKUM, O.D., Petitioner,

v.

STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF OPTOMETRY, Respondent.

No. AR-104.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 16, 1983.

Rehearing Denied March 9, 1983.

Stephen Marc Slepin, of Slepin, Slepin, Lambert & Waas, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Joseph W. Lawrence, II, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Tallahassee, for Dept. of Professional Regulation, for respondent.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., Chief Judge.

We deny Beckum's Rule 9.100 petition for review of nonfinal agency action. See § 120.68(1), Florida Statutes (1982).

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kibler v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REG.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carter v. DEPT. OF PRO. REGULATIONSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  2. Carrow v. DEPT. OF PROFESSIONAL REG.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Carter v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of OptometryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  4. State, Department of Administration, Division of Retirement v. HavenerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API