Legal Opinion

State v. Sears

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 10, 2005No. C-050150PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mark P. Painter, Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, the state of Ohio, challenges the trial court’s decision to dismiss the charges against defendant-appellee, Douglas Sears. The trial court held that nine months was an unreasonable delay between the filing of the complaint and the service of the warrant on Sears at an unrelated traffic stop. The state contends that the trial court incorrectly applied a constitutional analysis when the state statute of limitations allowed for a two-year period to begin prosecution for a first-degree misdemeanor.

{¶ 2} But the state confuses the issue. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. State v. LuckOhio Supreme Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. RiceOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. State v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Cleveland v. WhiteOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. State v. Gage, Court of Appeals of Ohio, First District, Hamilton County2018
  5. State v. MuhammadelOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API