Legal Opinion

Carlisle v. Knapp

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 15, 1889PublishedCited by 7 opinions

On error to the Essex Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

The Chancellor.

The defendant in error contracted, in writing, with Messrs. Robinson & McDowell to do all the work and furnish all the materials in the erection of a dwelling house, and the contract thus made was filed in accordance *330with the requirements of the second section of the Mechanics’ Lien law. Rev., p. 668. Messrs. Robinson & McDowell, in turn, contracted with Culver & Miller to do all the mason work which the contract with the defendant required, and Culver & Miller bought from the plaintiff Carlisle materials which they used in the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gardner & Meeks Co. v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1905
  2. Garrison v. BorioNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1901
  3. Bruce v. PearsallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
  4. Bayonne Building & Loan Ass'n v. WilliamsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1899
  5. Gardner & Meeks Co. v. HeroldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API