Hagood v. Blythe
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina
At Law. Action oil marshal’s bond.
1Opinion of the CourtSimonton, J.
Action at law on a marshal’s bond, against him and his sureties. A trial by jury waived. Complaint alleges the collection by the United States marshal of certain costs due plaintiff as clerk of the court in Farr v. Chick,—$187.75; the failure to pay the same to plaintiff; and demands judgment on the penalty of the bond. The collection of the money in July, 1883, by Blythe, marshal, and the failure on his part to pay it over, have been proved, except as to the sum of $12.32, which should he credited on the claim. The answer on behalf of the sureties sets up certain dealings between the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Farrar and Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
- Cox and Dick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- King v. BaldwinNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
- Cox v. WilderU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1872
- Locke v. Postmaster GeneralU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1824
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.