Legal Opinion

Mackenzie v. Hatton

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided November 15, 1893PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by Jane Mackenzie and Alice J. Jones against Loftus D. Hatton and others. Defendant Hatton demurs to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtBookstaver, J.

This action is brought by the plaintiffs, as executrices, etc., of the last will of Alexander Mackenzie, deceased, who, in his lifetime, was the owner of premises No. 35 West Fourth street, in the city of New York, against his tenant, Hatton, who was, at the times mentioned in the complaint, and still is, in possession of the premises, under a lease for a term of three years, running from May 1, 1892, and against his codefendants Simon Goldenberg, owner of the adjacent lot north of the plaintiff’s premises, and 'Michael and James J. Larkin, contractors with Goldenberg for the purpose of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Witty v. . MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Johnson v. . OppenheimNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Howard v. DoolittleThe Superior Court of New York City · 1854
  4. Sherwood v. SeamanThe Superior Court of New York City · 1857
  5. Ramsay v. WilkieNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mckenzie v. HattonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API