Wade v. Brantley & Crawley Const. Co.

On Rehearing.

FOSTER, Justice.

Appellant complains that the opinion did not respond to some of his contentions. One is that the answers are not sufficient, being in the nature of a categorical denial of insolvency, fraud, etc.

This contention would be better supported, if the narrative part of the answer were all. But the bill has an interrogating feature, and defendants are required to answer the interrogatories on oath. The answers to the interrogatories are properly filed as a feature of the answer to the bill. They set out fully the details showing that defendants were not insolvent, where…