Legal Opinion

Pollak Import-Export Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided February 22, 1994No. Court No. 90-09-00484 and 90-09-00484-SPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion

Goldberg, Judge:

This matter comes before the court on defendant’s motion, pursuant to USCIT Rules 59(e) and 60(a), (b), to amend the stipulated judgment previously entered in this action, and to sever and dismiss three entries for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff, Pollak Import-Export Corp. (“Pollak”) cross moves, pursuant to USCIT Rules 3(d) and 7, to amend the summons that commenced this action by adding the entries in question. The court finds that the three entries in question were not included in the original summons and that, as a result, it does not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walling v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  2. Border Brokerage Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
  3. Mitel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pollak Import-Export Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  2. Pollak Import-Export Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
  3. Pollak Import-Export Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
  4. Pollak Import-Export Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
  5. VWP of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API