Legal Opinion

Conkling v. Hollowell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 1, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKindig, J.

This is an action in-habeas corpus, brought by Jay Conkling,- a prisoner in.the staté penitentiary, at Fort Madison, against: T. E.-.-Hollowell, warden :of the institution. The point-.to be determined is-, Did. the county attorney’s information -under which 'the prisoner was sentenced state an-indictable offense,.-under Section: 13045 of the Code of 1924, or did it merely charge an unindictable misdemeanor, under -Section .13047 of said .Code?■ - , -■ • ' • . ■ • .•

That part of the -information-material, to this consideration is as-follows: ■ , -• . ..“The-said Jay Conkling, alias J. S.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Furey v. HollowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  2. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  3. McBain v. HollowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  4. Humphrey v. HollowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McCormick v. HollowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  2. Reeves v. LainsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  3. Convey v. HaynesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  4. State v. DillardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  5. State v. WyattSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API