Legal Opinion

Quincy, Missouri & Pacific R. R. v. Ridge

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1874PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from, Adair Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtLnwis, Judge

This was a proceeding under the general statutes to condemn a strip of ground through defendant’s land for the track of the plaintiffs railway. Commissioners were appointed and made their report, assessing the damages at $50. Defendants filed their exceptions, which were sustained by the court, and the award being set aside, a jury was impaneled to make a new appraisement. This resulted in an assessment of $32o, and judgment accordingly; from which, after nnsnceessfhl motions for new trial and in arrest, the plaintiff appealed.

It is claimed for error, that the court, in considering…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Soulard v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  2. Pacific Railroad v. ChrystalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857
  3. Lee v. Tebo & Neosho Rail RoadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  4. Jamison v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kansas City, Clinton & Springfield Railroad v. StorySupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  2. Wyandotte, Kansas City & Northwestern Railway Co. v. WaldoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  3. St. Louis, Oak Hill & Carondelet Railway Co. v. FowlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  4. McReynolds v. Kansas City, Clinton & Springfield Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  5. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API