Legal Opinion

Eggert v. Working

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1979No. 3814PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

Donavon Working recovered a judgment of $142,003.01 against Anne Eggert for personal injuries he had suffered. His wife Helen recovered a judgment of $25,000.00 for loss of consortium. Eggert appeals contending:

1. The trial court’s apportionment of negligence, finding Eggert to have been 85% negligent and Working to have been 15% negligent, is erroneous;

2. The trial court erred in finding Working’s injury to be a permanent one;

3. The trial court’s award of $90,-000.00 for impaired earning capacity, reduced by 15% for Working’s negligence, is erroneous;

4. The total…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kaatz v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Hasson v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Schreiner v. FruitAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Handeland v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  5. Ross v. CuthbertOregon Supreme Court · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lee v. Colorado Department of HealthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Feltch v. General Rental Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Runcorn v. Shearer Lumber Products, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Weaver v. MitchellWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Pam Mayo, Individually and as Next Friend of Kent and Jeremy Mayo, Her Minor Children v. Tri-Bell Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API