State Ex Rel. Watt & Sinclair of Florida, Inc. v. Bird
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion
On Petition for Rehearing.
Brown, J.
The petition for rehearing states that this Court omitted and failed to decide a vital question in this case. The question referred to is in substance this:. When at the conclusion of all the evidence in a case the defendant moves the court for an instructed verdict, which he is en titled to, and the defendant is compelled to take a writ of error to reverse an adverse verdict 'and judgment, which reversal he secures, is he not upon a remand of the case entitled,to a judgment as a matter of law?
If it were necessai-y or appropriate for us to rule upon this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Baltimore & Carolina Line, Inc. v. RedmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Gravette v. TurnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
- Dudley v. Harrison, McCready & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1937
- Watt & Sinclair of Florida, Inc. v. HunterSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
- Rivers v. City of GainesvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1934