Legal Opinion

Ninth Street Improvement Co. v. City of Ocean City

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 4, 1918PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 90 N. J. L. 106.

1Per curiam

The attack was on two ordinances in their entirety, and not upon any conviction had under penal provisions in either of them. In such a situation the ordinance will not be held void as unreasonable unless shown to be unreasonable in toto. North Jersey Street Railway Co. v. Jersey City, 75 N. J. L. 349, and cases cited. On this phase of the case we concur with the views of the Supreme Court as expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Minturn.

*704We also concur in the decision of that court that the “building code” had stood too .long unchallenged on the municipal records to permit of an attack on…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Island Express, Inc. v. FrederickSupreme Court of Delaware · 1934
  2. Beebe v. HannettMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Morris v. Sells-Floto Circus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
  4. Handler v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API