State v. Walker
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMAN, Justice.
Defendant, Russell Walker, seeks to reverse the judgment entered on his guilty plea to willful injury on the ground the conviction merged, as a matter of law, with his companion plea to the crime of voluntary manslaughter. The State counters that Walker entered knowing and voluntary pleas to two separate crimes and, therefore, merger under Iowa Code section 701.9 (1997) is not required. Under the unique facts of this case, we are convinced the State is correct. We therefore affirm.
The facts giving rise to this pointless tragedy were established during the plea proceedings. A…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. McKettrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
- State v. HalliburtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
- State v. HackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Valentin VelezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- State of Iowa v. Joseph D. CerettiSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- State v. FixCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2013
- State v. DittmerCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2002
- Amended January 12, 2016 State of Iowa v. Joseph D. CerettiSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.