Legal Opinion

Blomskog, Erickson & Cotton v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1919No. 15275PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Smith, J., entered June 29, 1918, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action in tort. •

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

Appellant is the owner of property at the northeast corner of Main street and Tenth avenue, in the city of Seattle, upon which is located a building used for residential purposes. In 1909 and 1910, the respondent regraded Jackson street, which runs in an easterly and westerly direction, parallel to and one *472block south of Main street, and in that work made a seventy-two foot cut south of appellant’s property. Following this cut, the hill between Main and Jackson streets began to slide, and continued in that condition up to the time of the trial of this case. In 1916, this slide invaded the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Scarpelli v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Roe v. Standard Furniture Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Marks v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. City of Seattle v. Washington Refining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Edmonds Land Co. v. City of EdmondsWashington Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnston v. OhlsWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Amsbury v. Cowles Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Bingaman v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Wolten Grocery Co. v. Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API