Legal Opinion

(PC) Langley v. Garcia

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 7, 2020No. 1:16-cv-01299Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RANDY LANGLEY, Case No.: 1:16-cv-01299-LJO-JLT (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO COMPEL AND 13 v. DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY AWARD OF EXPENSES 14 E. GARCIA; G. COOK, SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED 15 Defendants. (Docs. 39, 41) 16 17 Before the Court are Plaintiff’s motions to compel discovery responses. In his first 18 motion, Plaintiff requests “production of original video/audio tapes/CDs/electronically stored 19 evidence.” (Doc. 39.) The court construes this as a motion to compel…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Daniel F. v. Blue Shield of CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API